Thursday, November 20, 2008

Emotional Porn

So apparently the movie Twilight, based on the Stephanie Meyer teen-loves-vampire book, opens tonight. (Or tomorrow. At midnight, anyway, according to the news reports of the throngs already lining up in prom dresses -- ??? -- to go see it.)

I have to admit that I read the book. I knew nothing of the hype (easy to miss up here in farm country, where my only friends are the 5-and-under set) when my cute SIL loaned it to me. "I don't know what you'll think," she said. "I thought it was only okay, but plenty of women in my neighborhood are convinced it's The Best Book Ever; they totally have a testimony that Twilight is True." With that rousing endorsement, I took it home and began reading.

I guess it was a page-turner; I kept turning the pages. It only took me a few days to get through it -- which is impressive, considering how little time or mental energy I have for reading these days. But I finished the book with a feeling of profound irritation: First of all, I kept waiting for Edward's "family" to eat Bella, lol. Some of them (don't ask me to remember the names; it's been a while and nothing really stuck) glowered suspiciously at her from their seats in the high school cafeteria nearly the entire book, ultimately for no good reason. What a wasted set up. Secondly, the real danger, climax, and denouement.... Well, it was just lame. "Really? That's it?" I thought at the time. "That's all?" Yes, apparently that was all.

My primary irritation, however, stemmed from the frustration that real life just isn't like that. ("What," my brother asked, "you mean there aren't really vegetarian teenage vampires roaming the Northwest? I'm shocked!") No, perfect, brilliant, mysterious, gorgeously bright and sparkly boys do not fall for dull and unremarkable girls. It's the same irritation I feel after watching certain romantic comedies: You get all grinny and stupid as the credits roll -- awww, wasn't that sweet? -- and then the sugar high ends and you feel disgusted with yourself for having bought into such cheesy tripe.

I've had a difficult time articulating that sentiment for some reason, but I came across a term that describes it perfectly: Emotional porn. Twilight, romance novels in general (whether explicit or not), and a specific subset of chick flicks and RomComs exploit the universal desire for emotional connection, but in a way that is neither realistic nor healthy if one were to base or judge her own relationships on them. Just as visual porn can warp men's views of what real women are, should be, or behave like, emotional porn gives women a warped sense of how a good man should behave and of what it is to be in love ("love means being stalked by a controlling -- oh, I mean 'protective' -- boyfriend who watches you while you sleep! How romantic!").

Obviously I don't think most women are stupid enough to make such an overt connection from fiction to their real lives; they know it's just a fairy tale. But read / watch enough of it -- especially when you're young and impressionable (the books are supposedly geared toward teens, though I only know adult women who have read the series) -- and it seeps into your subconscious. Attitudes are subtly affected by the exposure, like it or not, and when the material is glorified the way Twilight has been (sorry, Tolstoy, Faulkner, Harper Lee, but Twilight is the BEST BOOK EVERRRRRR) you start to ignore the bad aftertaste and bask instead in the grinny sugar high. "Wow," you swoon. "I wish my husband was more like Edward."

Feel free to call me a Grinch, but I feel the same way about most fairy tales, too. Plenty of women miss out on what could be a more rich, full, and independent life because they're waiting for some white knight on a steed to come save them from their banal existence. Don't get me wrong, my daughters have all sorts of Disney Princess crap, but I really do try to minimize or alter what I consider these damaging cultural messages.

I haven't read any of the other books in the Twilight series; from what I've heard of how the plot develops, I think I'm glad. The last book, in particular, sounds really creepy! (But not in a good, spooky vampirey way, lol. More in an incestuous fundy way.) I have mixed feelings about the series' author, Stephanie Meyer. On the one hand, um, see above. On the other hand, though, she's one of my "tribe." She's a regular ol' Mormon girl, a BYU grad and a SAHM, who's done really well for herself. Yay for her! I don't begrudge her the success; I'm sure it couldn't have happened to a nicer person. I just wish she hadn't made all her money in porn.


~RCH~

11 comments:

mary plus vince said...

Lol... I'm going to see the movie tomorrow...

I've read all 4 books, but I'm kinda over the whole phenomenom (how the heck do you spell that?!). and yes, the 4th book was much weirder than the others.

i mostly read them for entertainment value, they are an easy + light read.

Jen said...

I had avoided the series but was thinking maybe I should at least try one so I could at least join in the constant conversation with the other women in my ward, but now I'm thinking not. Good post.

Beckle the Freckle said...

Hooray! I wanted desperately to say something about why I just couldn't make it through even the first half of Twilight...but you always make it sound so much more articulate than I ever could. Instead I put a flair on my corkboard that says "I doubt Edward's commitment to Sparkle Motion." Oh, snap! ;)

~B. said...

Hmm, well, I liked them. I wouldn't say they're "like the best books ever" {said in my best valley girlish voice}. But if you keep reading you find out just exactly WHY those characters act the way they do. Plus the first book wasn't as interesting because she spends so much dang time just setting up the stupid romance. The rest of the books have much more adventure in them. But it's not for everyone so whatev, right?

I don't think I can watch the movie though because Edward is just the wrong looking Edward in my mind.

Nicole said...

I had a similar reaction to the first Twilight book (the only one I read). It was the after taste that lingered. A few days later I randomly remembered that Meyer described in laborious detail the sandwich Bella made while waiting for her computer to warm up. Booo. What a waste of words.

Eliza said...

I enjoyed the books, like Mary said for an easy + light read (more cotton candy type reading and not something substantial to fill you up, ya know?).

But I absolutely agree that it could be a bad thing for young impressionable readers on what "love" should be and is like.

Uno Kidney said...

Someone I know read and loved the books. She even went as far as to say "Edward is ruining my marriage! I wish my husband were more like him".....
hmmmmmm.....
A bit obsessed? Plus, last book: Freaky weird and I don't know any teenage girls that read it...but then again, I don't know a lot of teenage girls either...

The Taylors said...

Well put. I have read all four books, and they were an enjoyable read; however, I think it's so silly when people talk about these books like they are the next American classic or whatever. It was entertaining, and it ends there. And I do worry about the younger crowd reading these...like my old junior high students who were ALL reading these. I think a lot of the romantic movies and books do us a disservice in creating an unrealistic view of what love is or should be. I had the same type of feelings with the movie Juno:it showed teenagers that getting pregnant and giving up your baby is easy and even glamorous. I know my students were not even close to being mature enough to understand the difference between reality and a story. To many of them, Edward is the perfect man they are all looking for.

And btw, I'm going to the movie tonight with all my girl friends plus all the other silly tweens up here. Should be good times!

RCH said...

See, I think you all are old enough and ... aware enough to read them purely for the fluff (and they do that well -- I seriously haven't knocked out a book that fast in years, it was such an easy read). But I honestly don't get the wider pop culture phenomenon these have become, and the grown women pining for a teenage vampire of their own. These are fluff, not literature, and they're certainly nothing to idolize or emulate!

And I really do worry about readers who devour these kinds of books (not just Stephanie Meyer's, but cheesy romances in general) to the exclusion of all others. Call me an alarmist, but it's porn, folks! Porn, I say! It'll warp your brain and hair will grow on your palms! ;-)

Ash said...

Thank you!! I totally agree. so does an old institute teacher I had who is also a family/marriage therapist. he warns all women to stay away from romance novels because just like porn, they warp your sense of what love/marriage should really be like.

anna jo said...

emotional porn... so true!

I've only read the first one, and couldn't exactly stand how she kept going on and on about how beautiful/gorgeous/attractive edward was. hello! she says it every time she talks about him. we already know you think he's a hot vampire! now show us why he's so amazing! it was too much for me.

and I kind of think the whole phenomenon is funny, what with all the married, adult women going crazy obsessed over these books. I've always felt that it's because they're missing something in their own actual, real relationships and edward is this perfect ideal because he is so beautiful/gorgeous/attractive...

and thus it is emotional porn. you are so insightful! :)

  Based on the Blogger template 'Isolation' by Ourblogtemplates.com © 2008

Back to TOP